Mitt Romney: Rooting for An Attack on America, Hoping for Iran to Get a Nuclear Weapon

We already know that the Republican party roots for America to fail. Their blabbermouth-in-chief said so, in so many words. But now, they have a nominee who roots for America to be attacked. That's not an exaggeration, and it's not made up. It is almost word for word what Mitt Romney said at the now-infamous fundraiser where he also managed to tell us that 47% of Americans are lazy moochers who see themselves as victims and wine and dine on government dough. Buzzfeed has the video as well as the transcript:
Questioner: When Carter was president, we had hostages. Ronald Reagan was able to make a statement even before he became, he was actually sworn in, and the hostages were released…

Mitt Romney: On the day of his inauguration.

Questioner: Right. So my question is really how can you sort of duplicate that scenario?

Romney: I could ask you, I could ask you how you do I duplicate that scenario?

Questioner: I think it had to do with the fact that the Iranians perceived Reagan… That’s why I’m suggesting that something that you say over the next few months gets the Iranians to understand that their pursuit of the bomb is something that you would prevent. And I think that’s something that could possibly resonate very well with the American public.

Romney: I appreciate the idea. One of the things that’s frustrating to me is that in a typical day like this, when I do three or four events like this, the number of foreign policy questions I get are between zero and one. And the American people are not concentrated at all on China, on Russia, Iran, Iraq. This President’s failure to put in place a status of forces agreement allowing ten to twenty thousand troops to stay in Iraq- unthinkable! And yet, in that election, in the Jimmy Carter election, the fact that we had hostages in Iran, I mean, that was all we talked about. And we had the two helicopters crash in the desert, I mean, that was the focus, and so him solving that made all the difference in the world. I’m afraid today that if you simply got Iran to agree to stand down on nuclear weapons, they’d go, “Now hold on. It’s really a-” I mean, if something of that nature presents itself I will work to find a way to take advantage of the opportunity.
And boy did he fall flat on his face trying to take that... ummm... "opportunity." If something of that nature presents itself? That nature? What nature, governor? The nature of the Iranian Hostage Crisis? Yep, that's what the Mitt Romney campaign has been hoping for - a crisis of the nature of the Iranian Hostage Crisis - a crisis in which Americans were taken hostage, and America was attacked. Because if there were such a crisis, "that [would be] all we [would] talk about." Mitt Romney is hoping that America is attacked so that he can take the "opportunity". Disgusting.

In damage control mode, the Romney campaign now says the "opportunity" he was talking about was an opportunity to stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons. I'm sure that makes it look just peachy, right? Actually, that makes it worse. Mitt Romney was talking about taking advantage of a crisis. Let's go through that real quick: there is no Iranian nuclear weapons crisis because... well, because Iran does not have nuclear weapons. So, Mitt Romney is hoping that an Iranian nuclear crisis comes to shore soon? In other words, he's praying for Iran to get nuclear weapons? Wow.

Like what you read? Chip in, keep us going.

They have to go all in. They have no choice.

"Government Dependency" vs. The Common Good: The Debate Republicans Are Really Scared Of