FLASHBACK: Dems offer to dial back violent rhetoric. GOP says "NO!"

I wrote this blog entry on Eclectablog nearly a year ago in March 2010. When you read it, consider the fact that Democrats made a concerted effort back then to rein in the use of violent metaphors and language/rhetoric. In the wake of the passage of the Affordable Care Act when emotions were high and passions were higher, the Democrats (along with many liberal commentators) recognized that the use of violent images and references could lead to someone getting hurt. And they were right. And they were rebuffed by the Republicans.
March 27, 2010 I shouldn't say this is "unbelievable" but it is. I suppose nothing should surprise me anymore. Representatives from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) drafted a bipartisan statement urging civility and decrying violence in the wake of the threats and violent rhetoric that erupted across the country this after Sunday's historic vote on health insurance reform. This is it:
As leaders of our respective national parties, we want to speak to all Americans about the importance of conducting our political debates in a manner and tone that respects our political system and demonstrates to the world the strength of our democracy. We have a system of government that allows the great issues of our day to be resolved peacefully and civilly and that serves as a beacon of hope to those around the world who yearn for political freedom, political stability, and governing without the threat of violence. We have a system that allows people to express approval of their government or change the party in power peaceably through the ballot box. Our Constitution affords Americans the right to assemble and petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Clearly, we have different positions on the merits of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. However, we together call on elected officials of both parties to set an example of the civility we want to see in our citizenry. We also call on all Americans to respect differences of opinion, to refrain from inappropriate forms of intimidation, to reject violence and vandalism, and to scale back rhetoric that might reasonably be misinterpreted by those prone to such behavior.
They sent this "Joint Civility Statement" to the Republican National Committee (RNC). You'll never guess in a million years what the Republican response was. Yup: NO!!!
Republicans see the statement as an attempt to force them to either reject the statement — allowing Democrats to say the RNC finds the incidents acceptable — or to sign on to something that the DNC would later wield against them. The proposed statement was faxed and hand-delivered to the RNC at midmorning Friday. POLITICO learned Friday afternoon that the RNC would not sign the DNC statement. RNC Communications Director Doug Heye told POLITICO that Steele chose not to agree to the statement because “we don’t need to do anything on their schedule or on their timetable.”
Well, at least they're consistent.
This was not something "we would never have imagined" as Arizona Governor Jan Brewer recently said. This was not only predictable, it was predicted. Let's not forget that. I'm just sayin'... P.S. You can uprate this at Reddit HERE.