Why Doesn't Hillary Clinton Just Admit That She Is Solely Responsible For Her Loss?

Why Doesn't Hillary Clinton Just Admit That She Is Solely Responsible For Her Loss?

Why doesn't Hillary Clinton just admit that she is solely responsible for her loss? Why will she not admit that she is guilty of all of her offenses? Why does she not plead guilty to this crime? Why does she not confess that she is a criminal? Lock her up!

If she is unwilling to admit to the crime that in itself is an admission of guilt. Lock her up! Benghazi! Emails! The Clinton Foundation! Harvey Weinstein! Lock her up!

Why doesn't Hillary Clinton just admit that she is the only one responsible for her loss. Why will she not admit to a crime she didn't commit. Since she was willing to admit that she could have done better she has admitted that is not perfect and if she is not perfect then it only stands to reason that she is guilty. Lock her up!

Why doesn't Hillary Clinton just go away and disappear? Why can't we just complain about her disappearance being an act of cowardice and pick her to death in her absence?

In almost every interview Hillary does and in so many panel discussions and news shows that discuss her the question keeps being repeated as to why Hillary hasn't put complete responsibility for everything on herself and when she acknowledges that she could potentially have done some things differently that is not accepted as being enough. She must accept full responsibility and if she doesn't she is badgered. Anything less than complete submission to the accusation is seen as an unacceptable response.

For her to take sole responsibility for her loss would be an untruth and an injustice. If she were to take sole responsibility for her loss that would mean that no one else needs to be held accountable for anything. People uncomfortable with a strong intelligent and capable woman have been ready consumers of her alleged lies and criminal conduct.

Some of the people engaged in this behavior know exactly what they are doing and some who prefer to remain blind to their participation in the attempt to "keep women in their place" are easy tools because although what they are doing might not be intentionally malicious they are still buying and feeding the same impulse. They are complicit. They have blood on their hands.

What we are seeing is a form of injustice. Hillary Clinton cannot be allowed to exist as who she is. She must be turned into an actual criminal. The thought of her having any power is seen as so dangerous it requires that she must be perceived as criminal in order to dismiss her. Of course the ones who are screaming about all of her injustices that have gone unpunished are the ones who are guilty of injustice. They are desperate to maintain a system that is unjust. The fact that they are so desperate is an indication that they are on the ropes. They are feeling the heat. They feel the force of change breathing down their necks and they are engaged in a last ditch effort to stop the unstoppable force of change.

In the midst of the seemingly endless noise of those who want to cling to the past Hillary Clinton continues to be willing to walk into the fire and to speak her truth, She disagrees without being disagreeable. She acts with great diplomacy. This is the continuation of a lifetime endeavor for her. She could have easily gone into hiding and said screw all of this. We can look to her for inspiration. She is an example of courage. She is a role model. Hillary Clinton is an extraordinary important player in the resistance.



Like what you read? Chip in, keep us going.


The war widow and the ambulatory sputum

The war widow and the ambulatory sputum

What should President Obama be doing?

What should President Obama be doing?

0