Tuesday, April 10, 2012

The War on Women is About More than Lady Parts

A Washington Post/ABC News poll released this morning is showing the President widening the gender gap, as women flee the Republican party like the plague they are.
A wide gender gap underlies the current state of the race. Romney is up eight percentage points among male voters but trails by 19 among women. [...]

In addition to his big lead among women — Obama won that demographic by 13 points in 2008 — the president is moving to secure other key elements of his winning coalition. As he did four years ago, he has overwhelming support from African Americans — 90 percent back his reelection effort — and he has a big lead among those ages 18 to 29. [...]

Obama continues to trail Romney by a big margin among white voters without college degrees, and he loses white men with college degrees by double digits, 57 to 39 percent. He counters with a big lead over Romney among white women who have a college degree or more education.
Translation: the only people voting Republican as a block are white males. Women are gone, people of color are gone, and gone by big margins.

Let me say for the record that I don't think women are running as fast as they can from the GOP just because of the Republican party's obsession with legislating lady-parts. That's a huge part of it, but that's not all of it. The Republican party has waged a war on women on economic and social issues. Let's get a few examples, shall we?

Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act: a total of 7 Republicans in the House and the Senate voted for it. 209 Republicans voted against equal pay for women. In 2009.
Unemployment benefits extension: Women tend to be more vulnerable to layoffs in a recession, and the Republicans fought tooth and nail against extending unemployment insurance benefits in the worst economic calamity since the Great Depression.

Payroll tax cut: Women tend to earn lower wages (hence we needed the Lilly Ledbetter legislation), working women - especially working women with children - tend to be under poverty more often than men and thus pay a greater share of their taxes in the form of payroll taxes, and the only tax cuts Republicans ever demanded be paid for are the president's payroll tax cuts, the first tax reduction for the working poor in memory.

Pell grants and student assistance: Women outnumber men among college students. Through all the GOP calls for austerity, President Obama has zealously protected and strengthened the Pell grant program, along with the federal investment in higher education. President Obama overhauled the student loan system, cutting the subsidy for banks out of the process and using that money to expand opportunity for students. Do you know how many Republicans voted for this? None.

Medicaid, food assistance, and other programs for the poor: President Obama's budget restores previous cuts to the nutrition assistance program and protects the most vulnerable in our society. Paul Ryan's budget all but eliminates assistance programs for the needy - disproportionately women and children. Ryan's budget would also end Medicaid's expansion under the Affordable Care Act and turn the program into an block grant program for states and limit spending regardless of cost, forcing more people out of Medicaid. As you know, Mitt Romney loves Paul Ryan.

Social Security and Medicare: Women live longer and earn less than men, necessitating their greater participation and reliance on these New Deal programs. Women represent 57% of all social security beneficiaries, and 68% of beneficiaries above 85. The Romney-Ryan plan for Medicare is to end it as we know it.

The bottom line is women have a far more vested interest in a fairer, more equitable society and a stronger social safety net. The Republicans are not simply offending women's sensibilities by meddling in women's health care and family planning; they are messing with women by attacking the social safety net, programs for the poor and the elderly, as well as students. Republican talking heads are right that women are not a monolithic voting group. But they are real people with real interest in seeing a fairer society with more opportunity and a stronger safety net. And the Republican party has completely divorced itself from both.

11 comments:

  1. Roberta_in_MN3:37 PM

    I just can't understand white or blue colar men going republican. It is in their best interest to vote Democratic. It always amazes me. If POTUS loses the blue colar vote, then they aught to have all of their benefits taken away (only kidding). And of course we know why, it all because he is a Democrat and a black one too boot. Especially, that he axtually talks to people like grownups. He is too good for this country, but we need him to stay in office for another four years. I think this is really imperative. 4 more years for 44. Woot!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. 1.  If I never hear the words "lady parts" again I will die a happy woman.
    2. I don't understand college educated white men.
    3. Women are also probably the major caretakers for their elderly parents.  They have to fight their way through the swamps of Medicare, prescription coverage, multiple doctors, nursing/assisted living/memory care homes, and all sorts of other nasty stuff.  My friend spend so much time trying to keep things straightened out for her mother who is 96 and in ill health.  They must want stuff like the simpler health care plans, closing the doughnut hole etc.
    4. President Obama constantly shows a deep respect for women young and old.  We know the speeches he gives and the legislation he espouses are not political ploys, but motivated by his sincere feelings.  You have only to watch how he interacts with Michelle and the girls.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Excellent summary, Deaniac.  I tweeted this post saying, "Women are more than their (our) ladyparts, and all our parts hate the GOP."  I don't see how anyone other than rich, white, straight men can vote for Republicans, but cognitive dissonance is a powerful thing.

    ReplyDelete
  4. If there were any doubt about GOP attitudes towards women, the Wisconsin GOP gov. and legislature has just repealed the equal pay law. When asked why, GOP Senator Glen Grothman said "money is more important to men."  Doubts, anyone? About what gender is entitled to power and wealth according to the GOP, and what gender isn't?

    http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/314-18/10862-money-is-more-important-for-men-wis-repeals-equal-pay-rights

    ReplyDelete
  5. Well, actually there are other polls showing Obama slightly ahead with men. White men, not so much. When you consider that most of the racism in this country is the product of white males, it's not surprising. Old white guys are their base. Good news is that is predominantly older white males. Our country's culture is actually changing for the better. In that respect the "Greatest Generation" was not so great. I'm an older white guy and also a life long Dem. and believer in a diverse, pluralistic America. And in my 64 years of life I am witnessing the greatest presidency of my life.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Churchlady3207:34 AM

    White males - here's a thought. What Romney and the GOP do to women they have planned for you.  Women always were the bellwether of what's coming for middle and working America, and yet you fall for their hype again and again. The GOP shucks you off like cornhusks at a BBQ, and you let this happen.  PAY ATTENTION to who has your back instead of who is leading you by the nose.  You may think you're immune, that they have your 'values' - but whose job goes overseas, who gets laid off, who goes without health care? You. So if you LIKE being screwed over, by all means pay no attention to what happens to the women in your lives and pretend your interests are the same as Romney's.  But please - don't whine when they stick the shiv in YOUR back.  You always were on their hit list.  Too bad you NEVER see it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Aquagranny9111:09 PM

    This makes me boil!!!  Over 50 years ago, I worked harvesting fruit to help out my family.  When we girls found out the boys were making more per basket of picked fruit than we were we got that same BS even though we picked more with less damaged fruit & some of the boys cheated by putting windfalls in the bottom of their baskets.

    That figging BS made me furious then & it makes me more furious now.  If I can do the same job as any boy or man then I damn well better be getting the same wages!

    I do try to avoid allowing hate into my heart but these GOP do task me greatly!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Aquagranny9111:16 PM

    I wish I could "like" your comment more than once.  I hope you don't mind but I cut & pasted it in an email to my crew, giving you & TPV proper credit for source.  I'm sure they will figure out a way to Tweet & FB

    ReplyDelete
  9. tienle7:44 PM

    Stellar, Deaniac.  Hadn't thought of it that way, but I will from this moment forward. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Churchlady3208:53 PM

    Well gosh, Aquagranny I'm honored you like it!  Thank you!  You may do whatever gets someone in the "guy camp" to think about this.  Historically women (and by extension kids) were always the canaries in the coal mine, and when men ignored that, they discovered time and again - they were next.  Time to wake up, stop putting irrelevant issues (color of skin) ahead of good sense.  Who's GOT your back instead of who's stabbing you IN your back?  Outta be clear by now...  So please - send whatever you like far and wide.  We can't afford the stupidity of the past because the evil possible in the future is much greater now.

    ReplyDelete
  11. CanadaGoose10:44 AM

    A British chef  (Jamie Oliver) was touring the US in 2009 for shows on regional differences -- primarily in food.  In the show I saw, he was somewhere in the south and talking to a group of (clearly) poor white people. Oliver said "You must be happy that you have a president now who's on your side..." He was greeted with a  lengthy outburst of racism that included the n-word. He was so shocked as he said later, that he was speechless.
    To me that just summed up the dissonance. Many poor whites who have everything to gain from a second term can't get past their racism to see it. Under a democratic administration, the condition of the poor will probably get better and certainly won't get worse.
    Under any republican administration, the situation for the poor will probably get worse and certainly won't get better. Truly, racism clouds the mind.

    ReplyDelete